Yatırımcı.AI

MT2 vs ZPA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MT2 (MT Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and ZPA (Ziraat Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

MT2ZPA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

MT2 vs ZPA Fund Comparison
MetricMT2ZPACategory median
Daily0.09%0.24%−0.07%
1 week0.64%0.47%−0.29%
1 month3.30%2.19%0.00%
3 months10.58%6.40%4.33%
6 months24.07%13.43%11.90%
YTD39.40%16.98%14.97%
1 year0.00%23.05%21.27%
3 years—115.12%111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the MT2 vs ZPA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of MT2 (MT Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and ZPA (Ziraat Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, MT2 leads in 7 and ZPA leads in 3. MT2 is a Hedge Fund fund managed by MT Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZPA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ZPA leads (0.24% vs 0.09%). 1 week: MT2 leads (0.64% vs 0.47%). 1 month: MT2 leads (3.30% vs 2.19%). 3 months: MT2 leads (10.58% vs 6.40%). 6 months: MT2 leads (24.07% vs 13.43%). YTD: MT2 leads (39.40% vs 16.98%). 1 year: ZPA leads (23.05% vs 0.00%). Size (TRY): MT2 leads (4.7B vs 4.5B). Investors: ZPA leads (967 vs 584). Risk: MT2 leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date MT2 returned 39.40% and ZPA returned 16.98%; over the last year MT2 returned 0.00% and ZPA returned 23.05%. Over the last month MT2 returned 3.30% and ZPA returned 2.19%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, MT2 has a size of TRY 4.7B with 584 investors, while ZPA has a size of TRY 4.5B with 967 investors. MT2 leads in size and ZPA leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of MT2 is 2 out of 7 and that of ZPA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.