PGS vs SKO Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PGS (Azimut Portföy Pay Geri Alımı Yapan Şirketler Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and SKO (Strateji Portföy Kar Payı Ödeyen Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | PGS | SKO | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | 0.07% | −1.15% | −1.32% |
| Daily | −2.17% | −2.09% | −1.77% |
| 1 week | −2.67% | −2.43% | −2.74% |
| 1 month | −8.69% | −7.50% | −7.45% |
| 3 months | −8.92% | −5.10% | −4.07% |
| 6 months | 7.75% | 2.73% | 6.56% |
| YTD | 14.56% | 25.15% | 18.36% |
| 1 year | 14.53% | 38.73% | 19.84% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the PGS vs SKO Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of PGS (Azimut Portföy Pay Geri Alımı Yapan Şirketler Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and SKO (Strateji Portföy Kar Payı Ödeyen Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, PGS leads in 2 and SKO leads in 8. PGS is a Stock Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SKO is a Stock Fund fund managed by Strateji Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Today (est.): PGS leads (0.07% vs −1.15%). Daily: SKO leads (−2.09% vs −2.17%). 1 week: SKO leads (−2.43% vs −2.67%). 1 month: SKO leads (−7.50% vs −8.69%). 3 months: SKO leads (−5.10% vs −8.92%). 6 months: PGS leads (7.75% vs 2.73%). YTD: SKO leads (25.15% vs 14.56%). 1 year: SKO leads (38.73% vs 14.53%). Size (TRY): SKO leads (157.2M vs 148.5M). Investors: SKO leads (2,211 vs 382).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, PGS or SKO?
Year to date PGS returned 14.56% and SKO returned 25.15%; over the last year PGS returned 14.53% and SKO returned 38.73%. Over the last month PGS returned −8.69% and SKO returned −7.50%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, PGS or SKO?
As of September 29, 2026, PGS has a size of TRY 148.5M with 382 investors, while SKO has a size of TRY 157.2M with 2,211 investors. SKO leads in size and SKO leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of PGS and SKO mean?
The CMB risk score of PGS is 6 out of 7 and that of SKO is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.