Yatırımcı.AI

LTL vs PGS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of LTL (Ahlatcı Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and PGS (Azimut Portföy Pay Geri Alımı Yapan Şirketler Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.

LTLPGS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

LTL vs PGS Fund Comparison
MetricLTLPGSCategory median
Today (est.)0.20%0.24%−0.60%
Daily−0.10%−2.17%−1.77%
1 week0.99%−2.67%−2.74%
1 month5.68%−8.69%−7.45%
3 months15.79%−8.92%−4.07%
6 months—7.75%6.56%
YTD16.63%14.56%18.36%
1 year—14.53%19.84%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 29, 2026, 13:32.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the LTL vs PGS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of LTL (Ahlatcı Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and PGS (Azimut Portföy Pay Geri Alımı Yapan Şirketler Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, LTL leads in 6 and PGS leads in 3. LTL is a Stock Fund fund managed by Ahlatcı Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PGS is a Stock Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Today (est.): PGS leads (0.24% vs 0.20%). Daily: LTL leads (−0.10% vs −2.17%). 1 week: LTL leads (0.99% vs −2.67%). 1 month: LTL leads (5.68% vs −8.69%). 3 months: LTL leads (15.79% vs −8.92%). YTD: LTL leads (16.63% vs 14.56%). Size (TRY): PGS leads (148.5M vs 145.9M). Investors: LTL leads (2,769 vs 382). Risk: PGS leads (6 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date LTL returned 16.63% and PGS returned 14.56%; over the last year LTL returned — and PGS returned 14.53%. Over the last month LTL returned 5.68% and PGS returned −8.69%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, LTL has a size of TRY 145.9M with 2,769 investors, while PGS has a size of TRY 148.5M with 382 investors. PGS leads in size and LTL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of LTL is 7 out of 7 and that of PGS is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.