ANS vs PGS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ANS (Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and PGS (Azimut Portföy Pay Geri Alımı Yapan Şirketler Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ANS | PGS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | 0.19% | −0.83% |
| Daily | −0.59% | −2.17% | −1.77% |
| 1 week | −4.46% | −2.67% | −2.74% |
| 1 month | −6.54% | −8.69% | −7.45% |
| 3 months | −6.13% | −8.92% | −4.07% |
| 6 months | 5.09% | 7.75% | 6.56% |
| YTD | 14.48% | 14.56% | 18.36% |
| 1 year | 14.66% | 14.53% | 19.84% |
| 3 years | 78.41% | — | 91.52% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ANS vs PGS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of ANS (Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and PGS (Azimut Portföy Pay Geri Alımı Yapan Şirketler Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, ANS leads in 5 and PGS leads in 4. ANS is a Stock Fund fund managed by Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; PGS is a Stock Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: ANS leads (−0.59% vs −2.17%). 1 week: PGS leads (−2.67% vs −4.46%). 1 month: ANS leads (−6.54% vs −8.69%). 3 months: ANS leads (−6.13% vs −8.92%). 6 months: PGS leads (7.75% vs 5.09%). YTD: PGS leads (14.56% vs 14.48%). 1 year: ANS leads (14.66% vs 14.53%). Size (TRY): PGS leads (148.5M vs 142.4M). Investors: ANS leads (13,630 vs 382).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, ANS or PGS?
Year to date ANS returned 14.48% and PGS returned 14.56%; over the last year ANS returned 14.66% and PGS returned 14.53%. Over the last month ANS returned −6.54% and PGS returned −8.69%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, ANS or PGS?
As of September 29, 2026, ANS has a size of TRY 142.4M with 13,630 investors, while PGS has a size of TRY 148.5M with 382 investors. PGS leads in size and ANS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of ANS and PGS mean?
The CMB risk score of ANS is 6 out of 7 and that of PGS is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.