MTH vs PGS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MTH (MT Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and PGS (Azimut Portföy Pay Geri Alımı Yapan Şirketler Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | MTH | PGS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −1.17% | 0.19% | −0.83% |
| Daily | −3.37% | −2.17% | −1.77% |
| 1 week | −12.04% | −2.67% | −2.74% |
| 1 month | −17.56% | −8.69% | −7.45% |
| 3 months | −5.65% | −8.92% | −4.07% |
| 6 months | 8.18% | 7.75% | 6.56% |
| YTD | 19.94% | 14.56% | 18.36% |
| 1 year | 46.93% | 14.53% | 19.84% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the MTH vs PGS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of MTH (MT Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and PGS (Azimut Portföy Pay Geri Alımı Yapan Şirketler Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, MTH leads in 6 and PGS leads in 4. MTH is a Stock Fund fund managed by MT Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PGS is a Stock Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Today (est.): PGS leads (0.19% vs −1.17%). Daily: PGS leads (−2.17% vs −3.37%). 1 week: PGS leads (−2.67% vs −12.04%). 1 month: PGS leads (−8.69% vs −17.56%). 3 months: MTH leads (−5.65% vs −8.92%). 6 months: MTH leads (8.18% vs 7.75%). YTD: MTH leads (19.94% vs 14.56%). 1 year: MTH leads (46.93% vs 14.53%). Size (TRY): MTH leads (149.5M vs 148.5M). Investors: MTH leads (1,966 vs 382).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, MTH or PGS?
Year to date MTH returned 19.94% and PGS returned 14.56%; over the last year MTH returned 46.93% and PGS returned 14.53%. Over the last month MTH returned −17.56% and PGS returned −8.69%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, MTH or PGS?
As of September 29, 2026, MTH has a size of TRY 149.5M with 1,966 investors, while PGS has a size of TRY 148.5M with 382 investors. MTH leads in size and MTH leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of MTH and PGS mean?
The CMB risk score of MTH is 6 out of 7 and that of PGS is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.