Yatırımcı.AI

NVT vs PUC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NVT (Neo Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) and PUC (Ak Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

NVTPUC
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

NVT vs PUC Fund Comparison
MetricNVTPUCCategory median
Daily0.10%0.10%0.05%
1 week0.65%0.69%0.44%
1 month2.80%2.96%0.38%
3 months9.18%9.90%3.95%
6 months19.96%21.41%8.45%
YTD33.50%36.38%16.06%
1 year43.29%46.81%20.98%
3 years252.76%259.49%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the NVT vs PUC Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of NVT (Neo Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) and PUC (Ak Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, NVT leads in 0 and PUC leads in 11. NVT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PUC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PUC leads (0.10% vs 0.10%). 1 week: PUC leads (0.69% vs 0.65%). 1 month: PUC leads (2.96% vs 2.80%). 3 months: PUC leads (9.90% vs 9.18%). 6 months: PUC leads (21.41% vs 19.96%). YTD: PUC leads (36.38% vs 33.50%). 1 year: PUC leads (46.81% vs 43.29%). 3 years: PUC leads (259.49% vs 252.76%). Size (TRY): PUC leads (8.7B vs 8.5B). Investors: PUC leads (870 vs 96). Risk: PUC leads (2 vs 3).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date NVT returned 33.50% and PUC returned 36.38%; over the last year NVT returned 43.29% and PUC returned 46.81%. Over the last month NVT returned 2.80% and PUC returned 2.96%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, NVT has a size of TRY 8.5B with 96 investors, while PUC has a size of TRY 8.7B with 870 investors. PUC leads in size and PUC leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of NVT is 3 out of 7 and that of PUC is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.