Yatırımcı.AI

DZM vs PUC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DZM (Deniz Portföy Beşinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and PUC (Ak Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

DZMPUC
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

DZM vs PUC Fund Comparison
MetricDZMPUCCategory median
Daily−0.04%0.10%0.05%
1 week0.47%0.69%0.44%
1 month0.76%2.96%0.38%
3 months4.91%9.90%3.95%
6 months9.49%21.41%8.45%
YTD15.95%36.38%16.06%
1 year22.43%46.81%20.98%
3 years156.18%259.49%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the DZM vs PUC Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DZM (Deniz Portföy Beşinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and PUC (Ak Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, DZM leads in 1 and PUC leads in 10. DZM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PUC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PUC leads (0.10% vs −0.04%). 1 week: PUC leads (0.69% vs 0.47%). 1 month: PUC leads (2.96% vs 0.76%). 3 months: PUC leads (9.90% vs 4.91%). 6 months: PUC leads (21.41% vs 9.49%). YTD: PUC leads (36.38% vs 15.95%). 1 year: PUC leads (46.81% vs 22.43%). 3 years: PUC leads (259.49% vs 156.18%). Size (TRY): PUC leads (8.7B vs 8.7B). Investors: DZM leads (3,346 vs 870). Risk: PUC leads (2 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date DZM returned 15.95% and PUC returned 36.38%; over the last year DZM returned 22.43% and PUC returned 46.81%. Over the last month DZM returned 0.76% and PUC returned 2.96%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, DZM has a size of TRY 8.7B with 3,346 investors, while PUC has a size of TRY 8.7B with 870 investors. PUC leads in size and DZM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DZM is 5 out of 7 and that of PUC is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.