Yatırımcı.AI

PTS vs PUC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PTS (QNB Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and PUC (Ak Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

PTSPUC
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

PTS vs PUC Fund Comparison
MetricPTSPUCCategory median
Daily0.10%0.10%0.05%
1 week0.68%0.69%0.44%
1 month2.98%2.96%0.38%
3 months9.87%9.90%3.95%
6 months21.26%21.41%8.45%
YTD35.87%36.38%16.06%
1 year46.16%46.81%20.98%
3 years—259.49%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the PTS vs PUC Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of PTS (QNB Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and PUC (Ak Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, PTS leads in 3 and PUC leads in 6. PTS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PUC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PTS leads (0.10% vs 0.10%). 1 week: PUC leads (0.69% vs 0.68%). 1 month: PTS leads (2.98% vs 2.96%). 3 months: PUC leads (9.90% vs 9.87%). 6 months: PUC leads (21.41% vs 21.26%). YTD: PUC leads (36.38% vs 35.87%). 1 year: PUC leads (46.81% vs 46.16%). Size (TRY): PUC leads (8.7B vs 8.2B). Investors: PTS leads (1,000 vs 870).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date PTS returned 35.87% and PUC returned 36.38%; over the last year PTS returned 46.16% and PUC returned 46.81%. Over the last month PTS returned 2.98% and PUC returned 2.96%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, PTS has a size of TRY 8.2B with 1,000 investors, while PUC has a size of TRY 8.7B with 870 investors. PUC leads in size and PTS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of PTS is 2 out of 7 and that of PUC is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.