Yatırımcı.AI

NVT vs PTS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NVT (Neo Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) and PTS (QNB Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

NVTPTS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

NVT vs PTS Fund Comparison
MetricNVTPTSCategory median
Daily0.10%0.10%0.05%
1 week0.65%0.68%0.44%
1 month2.80%2.98%0.38%
3 months9.18%9.87%3.95%
6 months19.96%21.26%8.45%
YTD33.50%35.87%16.06%
1 year43.29%46.16%20.98%
3 years252.76%—107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the NVT vs PTS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of NVT (Neo Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) and PTS (QNB Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, NVT leads in 1 and PTS leads in 9. NVT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PTS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PTS leads (0.10% vs 0.10%). 1 week: PTS leads (0.68% vs 0.65%). 1 month: PTS leads (2.98% vs 2.80%). 3 months: PTS leads (9.87% vs 9.18%). 6 months: PTS leads (21.26% vs 19.96%). YTD: PTS leads (35.87% vs 33.50%). 1 year: PTS leads (46.16% vs 43.29%). Size (TRY): NVT leads (8.5B vs 8.2B). Investors: PTS leads (1,000 vs 96). Risk: PTS leads (2 vs 3).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date NVT returned 33.50% and PTS returned 35.87%; over the last year NVT returned 43.29% and PTS returned 46.16%. Over the last month NVT returned 2.80% and PTS returned 2.98%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, NVT has a size of TRY 8.5B with 96 investors, while PTS has a size of TRY 8.2B with 1,000 investors. NVT leads in size and PTS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of NVT is 3 out of 7 and that of PTS is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.