Yatırımcı.AI

NLK vs ZPA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NLK (Nurol Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest Fon) and ZPA (Ziraat Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

NLKZPA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

NLK vs ZPA Fund Comparison
MetricNLKZPACategory median
Daily−0.09%0.07%0.06%
1 week0.52%0.50%0.56%
1 month2.94%2.47%1.84%
3 months9.67%6.49%3.29%
6 months21.44%12.90%7.90%
YTD40.23%20.62%17.53%
1 year48.02%23.93%21.48%
3 years—109.99%105.66%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the NLK vs ZPA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of NLK (Nurol Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest Fon) and ZPA (Ziraat Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, NLK leads in 8 and ZPA leads in 2. NLK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZPA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ZPA leads (0.07% vs −0.09%). 1 week: NLK leads (0.52% vs 0.50%). 1 month: NLK leads (2.94% vs 2.47%). 3 months: NLK leads (9.67% vs 6.49%). 6 months: NLK leads (21.44% vs 12.90%). YTD: NLK leads (40.23% vs 20.62%). 1 year: NLK leads (48.02% vs 23.93%). Size (TRY): NLK leads (5.3B vs 5.1B). Investors: ZPA leads (989 vs 771). Risk: NLK leads (1 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date NLK returned 40.23% and ZPA returned 20.62%; over the last year NLK returned 48.02% and ZPA returned 23.93%. Over the last month NLK returned 2.94% and ZPA returned 2.47%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, NLK has a size of TRY 5.3B with 771 investors, while ZPA has a size of TRY 5.1B with 989 investors. NLK leads in size and ZPA leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of NLK is 1 out of 7 and that of ZPA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.