EBS vs ZPA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EBS (Emaa Blue Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz-Abd Doları) Fon) and ZPA (Ziraat Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | EBS | ZPA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.03% | 0.07% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | 0.38% | 0.51% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | 1.69% | 2.05% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 5.61% | 6.35% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | 11.76% | 12.52% | 8.18% |
| YTD | 17.97% | 18.87% | 15.73% |
| 1 year | 22.40% | 23.36% | 20.69% |
| 3 years | — | 114.16% | 105.65% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the EBS vs ZPA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EBS (Emaa Blue Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz-Abd Doları) Fon) and ZPA (Ziraat Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EBS leads in 0 and ZPA leads in 9. EBS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZPA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: ZPA leads (0.07% vs 0.03%). 1 week: ZPA leads (0.51% vs 0.38%). 1 month: ZPA leads (2.05% vs 1.69%). 3 months: ZPA leads (6.35% vs 5.61%). 6 months: ZPA leads (12.52% vs 11.76%). YTD: ZPA leads (18.87% vs 17.97%). 1 year: ZPA leads (23.36% vs 22.40%). Size (TRY): ZPA leads (5.2B vs 4.9B). Investors: ZPA leads (998 vs 24).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, EBS or ZPA?
Year to date EBS returned 17.97% and ZPA returned 18.87%; over the last year EBS returned 22.40% and ZPA returned 23.36%. Over the last month EBS returned 1.69% and ZPA returned 2.05%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EBS or ZPA?
As of October 23, 2026, EBS has a size of TRY 4.9B with 24 investors, while ZPA has a size of TRY 5.2B with 998 investors. ZPA leads in size and ZPA leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EBS and ZPA mean?
The CMB risk score of EBS is — out of 7 and that of ZPA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.