MDF vs YGM Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MDF (Fiba Portföy Model Emtia Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) and YGM (Yapı Kredi Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | MDF | YGM | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.34% | −1.18% | −0.07% |
| 1 week | −0.62% | −1.75% | −0.29% |
| 1 month | 4.06% | 0.61% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 20.93% | 15.84% | 4.33% |
| 6 months | 8.79% | 12.72% | 11.90% |
| YTD | 20.52% | 21.33% | 14.97% |
| 1 year | 36.74% | 36.66% | 21.27% |
| 3 years | — | 136.26% | 111.30% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the MDF vs YGM Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of MDF (Fiba Portföy Model Emtia Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) and YGM (Yapı Kredi Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, MDF leads in 5 and YGM leads in 4. MDF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YGM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MDF leads (0.34% vs −1.18%). 1 week: MDF leads (−0.62% vs −1.75%). 1 month: MDF leads (4.06% vs 0.61%). 3 months: MDF leads (20.93% vs 15.84%). 6 months: YGM leads (12.72% vs 8.79%). YTD: YGM leads (21.33% vs 20.52%). 1 year: MDF leads (36.74% vs 36.66%). Size (TRY): YGM leads (525.2M vs 496.9M). Investors: YGM leads (1,818 vs 870).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, MDF or YGM?
Year to date MDF returned 20.52% and YGM returned 21.33%; over the last year MDF returned 36.74% and YGM returned 36.66%. Over the last month MDF returned 4.06% and YGM returned 0.61%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, MDF or YGM?
As of September 29, 2026, MDF has a size of TRY 496.9M with 870 investors, while YGM has a size of TRY 525.2M with 1,818 investors. YGM leads in size and YGM leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of MDF and YGM mean?
The CMB risk score of MDF is 6 out of 7 and that of YGM is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.