Yatırımcı.AI

FRA vs MDF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FRA (Azimut Portföy Mab Serbest Fon) and MDF (Fiba Portföy Model Emtia Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) side by side.

FRAMDF
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FRA vs MDF Fund Comparison
MetricFRAMDFCategory median
Today (est.)−0.31%—−0.74%
Daily−0.81%0.34%−0.07%
1 week−1.23%−0.62%−0.29%
1 month−1.31%4.06%0.00%
3 months−1.70%20.93%4.33%
6 months3.96%8.79%11.90%
YTD11.11%20.52%14.97%
1 year14.46%36.74%21.27%
3 years66.22%—111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 29, 2026, 15:19.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FRA vs MDF Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FRA (Azimut Portföy Mab Serbest Fon) and MDF (Fiba Portföy Model Emtia Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, FRA leads in 1 and MDF leads in 8. FRA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MDF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: MDF leads (0.34% vs −0.81%). 1 week: MDF leads (−0.62% vs −1.23%). 1 month: MDF leads (4.06% vs −1.31%). 3 months: MDF leads (20.93% vs −1.70%). 6 months: MDF leads (8.79% vs 3.96%). YTD: MDF leads (20.52% vs 11.11%). 1 year: MDF leads (36.74% vs 14.46%). Size (TRY): FRA leads (522.6M vs 496.9M). Investors: MDF leads (870 vs 2).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FRA returned 11.11% and MDF returned 20.52%; over the last year FRA returned 14.46% and MDF returned 36.74%. Over the last month FRA returned −1.31% and MDF returned 4.06%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, FRA has a size of TRY 522.6M with 2 investors, while MDF has a size of TRY 496.9M with 870 investors. FRA leads in size and MDF leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FRA is 6 out of 7 and that of MDF is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.