MDF vs PDF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MDF (Fiba Portföy Model Emtia Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) and PDF (Astra Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | MDF | Category median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.80% | −0.07% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | −0.95% | 0.14% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | 3.71% | 0.83% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 20.52% | 5.03% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 9.13% | 12.09% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 21.06% | 15.44% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 36.27% | 22.07% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | — | 108.62% | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the MDF vs PDF comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of MDF (Fiba Portföy Model Emtia Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) and PDF (Astra Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, MDF leads in 6 and PDF leads in 4. MDF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fıba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PDF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Qınvest Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PDF leads (−0.07% vs −0.80%). 1 week: PDF leads (0.14% vs −0.95%). 1 month: MDF leads (3.71% vs 0.83%). 3 months: MDF leads (20.52% vs 5.03%). 6 months: PDF leads (12.09% vs 9.13%). YTD: MDF leads (21.06% vs 15.44%). 1 year: MDF leads (36.27% vs 22.07%). Size (TRY): MDF leads (496.2M vs 475.3M). Investors: MDF leads (873 vs 47). Risk: PDF leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, MDF or PDF?
Year to date MDF returned 21.06% and PDF returned 15.44%; over the last year MDF returned 36.27% and PDF returned 22.07%. Over the last month MDF returned 3.71% and PDF returned 0.83%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, MDF or PDF?
As of September 28, 2026, MDF has a size of TRY 496.2M with 873 investors, while PDF has a size of TRY 475.3M with 47 investors. MDF leads in size and MDF leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of MDF and PDF mean?
The CMB risk score of MDF is 6 out of 7 and that of PDF is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.