Yatırımcı.AI

PDF vs YGM Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PDF (Astra Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and YGM (Yapı Kredi Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) side by side.

PDFYGM
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

PDF vs YGM Fund Comparison
MetricPDFYGMCategory median
Daily−0.10%−1.18%−0.07%
1 week−0.15%−1.75%−0.29%
1 month0.73%0.61%0.00%
3 months4.92%15.84%4.33%
6 months11.92%12.72%11.90%
YTD15.34%21.33%14.97%
1 year21.95%36.66%21.27%
3 years107.65%136.26%111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the PDF vs YGM Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of PDF (Astra Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and YGM (Yapı Kredi Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, PDF leads in 4 and YGM leads in 7. PDF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QInvest Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YGM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PDF leads (−0.10% vs −1.18%). 1 week: PDF leads (−0.15% vs −1.75%). 1 month: PDF leads (0.73% vs 0.61%). 3 months: YGM leads (15.84% vs 4.92%). 6 months: YGM leads (12.72% vs 11.92%). YTD: YGM leads (21.33% vs 15.34%). 1 year: YGM leads (36.66% vs 21.95%). 3 years: YGM leads (136.26% vs 107.65%). Size (TRY): YGM leads (525.2M vs 474.9M). Investors: YGM leads (1,818 vs 46). Risk: PDF leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date PDF returned 15.34% and YGM returned 21.33%; over the last year PDF returned 21.95% and YGM returned 36.66%. Over the last month PDF returned 0.73% and YGM returned 0.61%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, PDF has a size of TRY 474.9M with 46 investors, while YGM has a size of TRY 525.2M with 1,818 investors. YGM leads in size and YGM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of PDF is 5 out of 7 and that of YGM is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.