Yatırımcı.AI

ANS vs LTL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ANS (Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and LTL (Ahlatcı Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.

ANSLTL
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ANS vs LTL Fund Comparison
MetricANSLTLCategory median
Today (est.)—−0.04%0.36%
Daily0.96%0.67%1.08%
1 week3.70%2.55%2.86%
1 month−1.66%0.37%−3.07%
3 months−7.81%8.53%−8.78%
6 months−9.62%—−11.88%
YTD11.05%19.28%11.07%
1 year17.20%—18.62%
3 years79.37%—90.23%
Returns are based on prices as of November 13, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Nov 13, 2026, 18:15.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ANS vs LTL Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ANS (Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and LTL (Ahlatcı Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, ANS leads in 4 and LTL leads in 4. ANS is a Stock Fund fund managed by Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; LTL is a Stock Fund fund managed by Ahlatcı Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ANS leads (0.96% vs 0.67%). 1 week: ANS leads (3.70% vs 2.55%). 1 month: LTL leads (0.37% vs −1.66%). 3 months: LTL leads (8.53% vs −7.81%). YTD: LTL leads (19.28% vs 11.05%). Size (TRY): LTL leads (136.8M vs 136M). Investors: ANS leads (13,593 vs 2,255). Risk: ANS leads (6 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ANS returned 11.05% and LTL returned 19.28%; over the last year ANS returned 17.20% and LTL returned —. Over the last month ANS returned −1.66% and LTL returned 0.37%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 13, 2026, ANS has a size of TRY 136M with 13,593 investors, while LTL has a size of TRY 136.8M with 2,255 investors. LTL leads in size and ANS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ANS is 6 out of 7 and that of LTL is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.