Yatırımcı.AI

KRT vs PDF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KRT (Kare Portföy Türkiye Odaklı Serbest (Döviz ) Fon) and PDF (Astra Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

KRTPDF
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KRT vs PDF Fund Comparison
MetricKRTPDFCategory median
Daily−0.29%0.15%0.09%
1 week0.05%0.81%0.68%
1 month1.74%3.00%1.81%
3 months4.50%5.41%3.32%
6 months11.08%12.37%8.80%
YTD18.41%18.76%16.85%
1 year21.99%22.76%20.81%
3 years109.47%105.82%104.54%
Returns are based on prices as of November 6, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KRT vs PDF Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KRT (Kare Portföy Türkiye Odaklı Serbest (Döviz ) Fon) and PDF (Astra Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 6, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, KRT leads in 3 and PDF leads in 8. KRT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PDF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QInvest Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PDF leads (0.15% vs −0.29%). 1 week: PDF leads (0.81% vs 0.05%). 1 month: PDF leads (3.00% vs 1.74%). 3 months: PDF leads (5.41% vs 4.50%). 6 months: PDF leads (12.37% vs 11.08%). YTD: PDF leads (18.76% vs 18.41%). 1 year: PDF leads (22.76% vs 21.99%). 3 years: KRT leads (109.47% vs 105.82%). Size (TRY): PDF leads (486.5M vs 472.6M). Investors: KRT leads (119 vs 42). Risk: KRT leads (3 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KRT returned 18.41% and PDF returned 18.76%; over the last year KRT returned 21.99% and PDF returned 22.76%. Over the last month KRT returned 1.74% and PDF returned 3.00%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 6, 2026, KRT has a size of TRY 472.6M with 119 investors, while PDF has a size of TRY 486.5M with 42 investors. PDF leads in size and KRT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KRT is 3 out of 7 and that of PDF is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.