Yatırımcı.AI

BSM vs KRT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BSM (Global MD Portföy Berrak Serbest Fon) and KRT (Kare Portföy Türkiye Odaklı Serbest (Döviz ) Fon) side by side.

BSMKRT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BSM vs KRT Fund Comparison
MetricBSMKRTCategory median
Daily0.86%−0.29%0.09%
1 week2.17%0.05%0.68%
1 month4.10%1.74%1.81%
3 months13.41%4.50%3.32%
6 months31.67%11.08%8.80%
YTD69.83%18.41%16.85%
1 year90.66%21.99%20.81%
3 years—109.47%104.54%
Returns are based on prices as of November 6, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BSM vs KRT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BSM (Global MD Portföy Berrak Serbest Fon) and KRT (Kare Portföy Türkiye Odaklı Serbest (Döviz ) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 6, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BSM leads in 8 and KRT leads in 2. BSM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Global MD Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KRT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BSM leads (0.86% vs −0.29%). 1 week: BSM leads (2.17% vs 0.05%). 1 month: BSM leads (4.10% vs 1.74%). 3 months: BSM leads (13.41% vs 4.50%). 6 months: BSM leads (31.67% vs 11.08%). YTD: BSM leads (69.83% vs 18.41%). 1 year: BSM leads (90.66% vs 21.99%). Size (TRY): KRT leads (472.6M vs 461.9M). Investors: BSM leads (1,143 vs 119). Risk: KRT leads (3 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BSM returned 69.83% and KRT returned 18.41%; over the last year BSM returned 90.66% and KRT returned 21.99%. Over the last month BSM returned 4.10% and KRT returned 1.74%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 6, 2026, BSM has a size of TRY 461.9M with 1,143 investors, while KRT has a size of TRY 472.6M with 119 investors. KRT leads in size and BSM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BSM is 7 out of 7 and that of KRT is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.