GMI vs PDF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GMI (Ak Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and PDF (Astra Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GMI | Category median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.05% | 0.15% | 0.09% |
| 1 week | −5.18% | 0.81% | 0.68% |
| 1 month | −14.36% | 3.00% | 1.81% |
| 3 months | −6.50% | 5.41% | 3.32% |
| 6 months | −24.41% | 12.37% | 8.80% |
| YTD | −24.58% | 18.76% | 16.85% |
| 1 year | 14.31% | 22.76% | 20.81% |
| 3 years | — | 105.82% | 104.54% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GMI vs PDF Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GMI (Ak Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and PDF (Astra Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 6, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GMI leads in 2 and PDF leads in 8. GMI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PDF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QInvest Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PDF leads (0.15% vs 0.05%). 1 week: PDF leads (0.81% vs −5.18%). 1 month: PDF leads (3.00% vs −14.36%). 3 months: PDF leads (5.41% vs −6.50%). 6 months: PDF leads (12.37% vs −24.41%). YTD: PDF leads (18.76% vs −24.58%). 1 year: PDF leads (22.76% vs 14.31%). Size (TRY): GMI leads (498.4M vs 486.5M). Investors: GMI leads (4,616 vs 42). Risk: PDF leads (5 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GMI or PDF?
Year to date GMI returned −24.58% and PDF returned 18.76%; over the last year GMI returned 14.31% and PDF returned 22.76%. Over the last month GMI returned −14.36% and PDF returned 3.00%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GMI or PDF?
As of November 6, 2026, GMI has a size of TRY 498.4M with 4,616 investors, while PDF has a size of TRY 486.5M with 42 investors. GMI leads in size and GMI leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GMI and PDF mean?
The CMB risk score of GMI is 7 out of 7 and that of PDF is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.