KPP vs MPL Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KPP (Kare Portföy Para Piyasası Fonu) and MPL (Mt Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | KPP | MPL | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.30% | 0.27% | 0.29% |
| 1 week | 0.70% | 0.61% | 0.70% |
| 1 month | 3.04% | 3.12% | 3.12% |
| 3 months | 9.91% | 10.25% | 9.98% |
| 6 months | 21.63% | 19.47% | 21.60% |
| YTD | 32.73% | 31.68% | 32.28% |
| 1 year | 47.04% | 47.34% | 46.56% |
| 3 years | 81.88% | — | 257.27% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the KPP vs MPL comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of KPP (Kare Portföy Para Piyasası Fonu) and MPL (Mt Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, KPP leads in 6 and MPL leads in 4. KPP is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MPL is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Mt Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: KPP leads (0.30% vs 0.27%). 1 week: KPP leads (0.70% vs 0.61%). 1 month: MPL leads (3.12% vs 3.04%). 3 months: MPL leads (10.25% vs 9.91%). 6 months: KPP leads (21.63% vs 19.47%). YTD: KPP leads (32.73% vs 31.68%). 1 year: MPL leads (47.34% vs 47.04%). Size (TRY): KPP leads (364.2M vs 254.7M). Investors: MPL leads (565 vs 548). Risk: KPP leads (1 vs 2).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, KPP or MPL?
Year to date KPP returned 32.73% and MPL returned 31.68%; over the last year KPP returned 47.04% and MPL returned 47.34%. Over the last month KPP returned 3.04% and MPL returned 3.12%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, KPP or MPL?
As of September 28, 2026, KPP has a size of TRY 364.2M with 548 investors, while MPL has a size of TRY 254.7M with 565 investors. KPP leads in size and MPL leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of KPP and MPL mean?
The CMB risk score of KPP is 1 out of 7 and that of MPL is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.