MPL vs SPP Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MPL (Mt Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and SPP (Sparta Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | MPL | SPP | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.27% | 0.32% | 0.29% |
| 1 week | 0.61% | 0.76% | 0.70% |
| 1 month | 3.12% | 3.18% | 3.12% |
| 3 months | 10.25% | 10.30% | 9.98% |
| 6 months | 19.47% | 23.06% | 21.60% |
| YTD | 31.68% | 33.67% | 32.28% |
| 1 year | 47.34% | 48.49% | 46.56% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the MPL vs SPP comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of MPL (Mt Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and SPP (Sparta Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, MPL leads in 1 and SPP leads in 9. MPL is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Mt Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SPP is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Sparta Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: SPP leads (0.32% vs 0.27%). 1 week: SPP leads (0.76% vs 0.61%). 1 month: SPP leads (3.18% vs 3.12%). 3 months: SPP leads (10.30% vs 10.25%). 6 months: SPP leads (23.06% vs 19.47%). YTD: SPP leads (33.67% vs 31.68%). 1 year: SPP leads (48.49% vs 47.34%). Size (TRY): MPL leads (254.7M vs 250M). Investors: SPP leads (616 vs 565). Risk: SPP leads (1 vs 2).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, MPL or SPP?
Year to date MPL returned 31.68% and SPP returned 33.67%; over the last year MPL returned 47.34% and SPP returned 48.49%. Over the last month MPL returned 3.12% and SPP returned 3.18%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, MPL or SPP?
As of September 28, 2026, MPL has a size of TRY 254.7M with 565 investors, while SPP has a size of TRY 250M with 616 investors. MPL leads in size and SPP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of MPL and SPP mean?
The CMB risk score of MPL is 2 out of 7 and that of SPP is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.