Yatırımcı.AI

KPP vs PRD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KPP (Kare Portföy Para Piyasası Fonu) and PRD (Piramit Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.

KPPPRD
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

KPP vs PRD Fund Comparison
MetricKPPPRDCategory median
Daily0.30%0.30%0.29%
1 week0.70%0.73%0.70%
1 month3.04%3.29%3.12%
3 months9.91%10.60%9.98%
6 months21.63%22.93%21.60%
YTD32.73%33.11%32.28%
1 year47.04%48.45%46.56%
3 years81.88%33.14%257.27%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the KPP vs PRD comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KPP (Kare Portföy Para Piyasası Fonu) and PRD (Piramit Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, KPP leads in 4 and PRD leads in 7. KPP is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PRD is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Piramit Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PRD leads (0.30% vs 0.30%). 1 week: PRD leads (0.73% vs 0.70%). 1 month: PRD leads (3.29% vs 3.04%). 3 months: PRD leads (10.60% vs 9.91%). 6 months: PRD leads (22.93% vs 21.63%). YTD: PRD leads (33.11% vs 32.73%). 1 year: PRD leads (48.45% vs 47.04%). 3 years: KPP leads (81.88% vs 33.14%). Size (TRY): KPP leads (364.2M vs 301.7M). Investors: KPP leads (548 vs 452). Risk: KPP leads (1 vs 2).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date KPP returned 32.73% and PRD returned 33.11%; over the last year KPP returned 47.04% and PRD returned 48.45%. Over the last month KPP returned 3.04% and PRD returned 3.29%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, KPP has a size of TRY 364.2M with 548 investors, while PRD has a size of TRY 301.7M with 452 investors. KPP leads in size and KPP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KPP is 1 out of 7 and that of PRD is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.