MPL vs PRD Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MPL (Mt Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PRD (Piramit Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | MPL | PRD | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.27% | 0.30% | 0.29% |
| 1 week | 0.61% | 0.73% | 0.70% |
| 1 month | 3.12% | 3.29% | 3.12% |
| 3 months | 10.25% | 10.60% | 9.98% |
| 6 months | 19.47% | 22.93% | 21.60% |
| YTD | 31.68% | 33.11% | 32.28% |
| 1 year | 47.34% | 48.45% | 46.56% |
| 3 years | — | 33.14% | 257.27% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the MPL vs PRD comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of MPL (Mt Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PRD (Piramit Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, MPL leads in 1 and PRD leads in 8. MPL is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Mt Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PRD is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Piramit Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PRD leads (0.30% vs 0.27%). 1 week: PRD leads (0.73% vs 0.61%). 1 month: PRD leads (3.29% vs 3.12%). 3 months: PRD leads (10.60% vs 10.25%). 6 months: PRD leads (22.93% vs 19.47%). YTD: PRD leads (33.11% vs 31.68%). 1 year: PRD leads (48.45% vs 47.34%). Size (TRY): PRD leads (301.7M vs 254.7M). Investors: MPL leads (565 vs 452).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, MPL or PRD?
Year to date MPL returned 31.68% and PRD returned 33.11%; over the last year MPL returned 47.34% and PRD returned 48.45%. Over the last month MPL returned 3.12% and PRD returned 3.29%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, MPL or PRD?
As of September 28, 2026, MPL has a size of TRY 254.7M with 565 investors, while PRD has a size of TRY 301.7M with 452 investors. PRD leads in size and MPL leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of MPL and PRD mean?
The CMB risk score of MPL is 2 out of 7 and that of PRD is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.