Yatırımcı.AI

HVT vs KPP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of HVT (Allbatross Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and KPP (Kare Portföy Para Piyasası Fonu) side by side.

HVTKPP
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

HVT vs KPP Fund Comparison
MetricHVTKPPCategory median
Daily0.31%0.30%0.29%
1 week0.73%0.70%0.70%
1 month3.38%3.04%3.12%
3 months10.67%9.91%9.98%
6 months23.08%21.63%21.60%
YTD35.75%32.73%32.28%
1 year51.58%47.04%46.56%
3 years276.21%81.88%257.27%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the HVT vs KPP comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of HVT (Allbatross Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and KPP (Kare Portföy Para Piyasası Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, HVT leads in 10 and KPP leads in 0. HVT is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi Anonim Şirketi; KPP is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: HVT leads (0.31% vs 0.30%). 1 week: HVT leads (0.73% vs 0.70%). 1 month: HVT leads (3.38% vs 3.04%). 3 months: HVT leads (10.67% vs 9.91%). 6 months: HVT leads (23.08% vs 21.63%). YTD: HVT leads (35.75% vs 32.73%). 1 year: HVT leads (51.58% vs 47.04%). 3 years: HVT leads (276.21% vs 81.88%). Size (TRY): HVT leads (426.1M vs 364.2M). Investors: HVT leads (1,391 vs 548).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date HVT returned 35.75% and KPP returned 32.73%; over the last year HVT returned 51.58% and KPP returned 47.04%. Over the last month HVT returned 3.38% and KPP returned 3.04%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, HVT has a size of TRY 426.1M with 1,391 investors, while KPP has a size of TRY 364.2M with 548 investors. HVT leads in size and HVT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of HVT is 1 out of 7 and that of KPP is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.