Yatırımcı.AI

KIE vs KPP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KIE (Trıve Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and KPP (Kare Portföy Para Piyasası Fonu) side by side.

KIEKPP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KIE vs KPP Fund Comparison
MetricKIEKPPCategory median
Daily0.29%0.30%0.29%
1 week0.70%0.70%0.70%
1 month3.41%3.04%3.12%
3 months11.00%9.91%9.98%
6 months23.25%21.63%21.60%
YTD31.56%32.73%32.28%
1 year45.59%47.04%46.56%
3 years259.81%81.88%257.27%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KIE vs KPP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KIE (Trıve Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and KPP (Kare Portföy Para Piyasası Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, KIE leads in 6 and KPP leads in 5. KIE is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Trıve Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KPP is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KPP leads (0.30% vs 0.29%). 1 week: KPP leads (0.70% vs 0.70%). 1 month: KIE leads (3.41% vs 3.04%). 3 months: KIE leads (11.00% vs 9.91%). 6 months: KIE leads (23.25% vs 21.63%). YTD: KPP leads (32.73% vs 31.56%). 1 year: KPP leads (47.04% vs 45.59%). 3 years: KIE leads (259.81% vs 81.88%). Size (TRY): KIE leads (373.1M vs 364.2M). Investors: KIE leads (865 vs 548). Risk: KPP leads (1 vs 2).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KIE returned 31.56% and KPP returned 32.73%; over the last year KIE returned 45.59% and KPP returned 47.04%. Over the last month KIE returned 3.41% and KPP returned 3.04%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, KIE has a size of TRY 373.1M with 865 investors, while KPP has a size of TRY 364.2M with 548 investors. KIE leads in size and KIE leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KIE is 2 out of 7 and that of KPP is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.