GTZ vs GUM Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GTZ (Garanti Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepeti Fonu) and GUM (Ak Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GTZ | GUM | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.87% | 0.73% | 0.12% |
| 1 week | 1.43% | 1.07% | 0.70% |
| 1 month | −11.61% | −12.03% | −1.87% |
| 3 months | −15.11% | −15.18% | −0.88% |
| 6 months | −31.59% | −31.59% | 0.51% |
| YTD | −20.54% | −20.56% | 20.46% |
| 1 year | 17.02% | 17.40% | 27.26% |
| 3 years | 269.63% | 261.10% | 160.49% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GTZ vs GUM Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GTZ (Garanti Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepeti Fonu) and GUM (Ak Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GTZ leads in 8 and GUM leads in 1. GTZ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GUM is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GTZ leads (0.87% vs 0.73%). 1 week: GTZ leads (1.43% vs 1.07%). 1 month: GTZ leads (−11.61% vs −12.03%). 3 months: GTZ leads (−15.11% vs −15.18%). YTD: GTZ leads (−20.54% vs −20.56%). 1 year: GUM leads (17.40% vs 17.02%). 3 years: GTZ leads (269.63% vs 261.10%). Size (TRY): GTZ leads (9.9B vs 5.2B). Investors: GTZ leads (55,824 vs 48,139).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GTZ or GUM?
Year to date GTZ returned −20.54% and GUM returned −20.56%; over the last year GTZ returned 17.02% and GUM returned 17.40%. Over the last month GTZ returned −11.61% and GUM returned −12.03%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GTZ or GUM?
As of November 12, 2026, GTZ has a size of TRY 9.9B with 55,824 investors, while GUM has a size of TRY 5.2B with 48,139 investors. GTZ leads in size and GTZ leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GTZ and GUM mean?
The CMB risk score of GTZ is 7 out of 7 and that of GUM is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.