Yatırımcı.AI

GTZ vs MZL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GTZ (Garanti Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepeti Fonu) and MZL (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. İkinci Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

GTZMZL
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

GTZ vs MZL Fund Comparison
MetricGTZMZLCategory median
Daily0.88%−0.97%0.00%
1 week−3.18%−0.03%−0.18%
1 month−5.02%−1.02%−1.21%
3 months13.65%5.23%6.24%
6 months0.02%12.04%13.40%
YTD−3.79%22.89%22.20%
1 year55.89%33.77%35.20%
3 years352.36%194.36%174.60%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the GTZ vs MZL comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GTZ (Garanti Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepeti Fonu) and MZL (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. İkinci Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GTZ leads in 5 and MZL leads in 6. GTZ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MZL is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GTZ leads (0.88% vs −0.97%). 1 week: MZL leads (−0.03% vs −3.18%). 1 month: MZL leads (−1.02% vs −5.02%). 3 months: GTZ leads (13.65% vs 5.23%). 6 months: MZL leads (12.04% vs 0.02%). YTD: MZL leads (22.89% vs −3.79%). 1 year: GTZ leads (55.89% vs 33.77%). 3 years: GTZ leads (352.36% vs 194.36%). Size (TRY): GTZ leads (12B vs 8.3B). Investors: MZL leads (152,047 vs 59,292). Risk: MZL leads (4 vs 7).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date GTZ returned −3.79% and MZL returned 22.89%; over the last year GTZ returned 55.89% and MZL returned 33.77%. Over the last month GTZ returned −5.02% and MZL returned −1.02%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GTZ has a size of TRY 12B with 59,292 investors, while MZL has a size of TRY 8.3B with 152,047 investors. GTZ leads in size and MZL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GTZ is 7 out of 7 and that of MZL is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.