GUM vs MZP Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GUM (Ak Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepeti Fonu) and MZP (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GUM | MZP | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.73% | 0.20% | 0.12% |
| 1 week | 1.07% | 1.17% | 0.70% |
| 1 month | −12.03% | −1.11% | −1.87% |
| 3 months | −15.18% | 0.18% | −0.88% |
| 6 months | −31.59% | −2.69% | 0.51% |
| YTD | −20.56% | 19.60% | 20.46% |
| 1 year | 17.40% | 27.52% | 27.26% |
| 3 years | 261.10% | 167.55% | 160.49% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GUM vs MZP Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GUM (Ak Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepeti Fonu) and MZP (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GUM leads in 2 and MZP leads in 9. GUM is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MZP is a Fund of Funds fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GUM leads (0.73% vs 0.20%). 1 week: MZP leads (1.17% vs 1.07%). 1 month: MZP leads (−1.11% vs −12.03%). 3 months: MZP leads (0.18% vs −15.18%). 6 months: MZP leads (−2.69% vs −31.59%). YTD: MZP leads (19.60% vs −20.56%). 1 year: MZP leads (27.52% vs 17.40%). 3 years: GUM leads (261.10% vs 167.55%). Size (TRY): MZP leads (5.3B vs 5.2B). Investors: MZP leads (118,882 vs 48,139). Risk: MZP leads (5 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GUM or MZP?
Year to date GUM returned −20.56% and MZP returned 19.60%; over the last year GUM returned 17.40% and MZP returned 27.52%. Over the last month GUM returned −12.03% and MZP returned −1.11%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GUM or MZP?
As of November 12, 2026, GUM has a size of TRY 5.2B with 48,139 investors, while MZP has a size of TRY 5.3B with 118,882 investors. MZP leads in size and MZP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GUM and MZP mean?
The CMB risk score of GUM is 7 out of 7 and that of MZP is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.