GUM vs MZP Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GUM (Ak Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepetı Fonu) and MZP (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GUM | MZP | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.72% | 0.40% | 0.38% |
| 1 week | −3.43% | 0.29% | 0.25% |
| 1 month | −5.63% | −1.52% | −1.05% |
| 3 months | 14.38% | 4.53% | 6.44% |
| 6 months | −0.19% | 11.47% | 13.81% |
| YTD | −2.88% | 22.69% | 22.40% |
| 1 year | 57.50% | 32.84% | 35.81% |
| 3 years | 339.17% | 180.60% | 175.03% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GUM vs MZP comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GUM (Ak Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepetı Fonu) and MZP (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GUM leads in 5 and MZP leads in 6. GUM is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MZP is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GUM leads (0.72% vs 0.40%). 1 week: MZP leads (0.29% vs −3.43%). 1 month: MZP leads (−1.52% vs −5.63%). 3 months: GUM leads (14.38% vs 4.53%). 6 months: MZP leads (11.47% vs −0.19%). YTD: MZP leads (22.69% vs −2.88%). 1 year: GUM leads (57.50% vs 32.84%). 3 years: GUM leads (339.17% vs 180.60%). Size (TRY): GUM leads (6.3B vs 5.7B). Investors: MZP leads (123,085 vs 50,674). Risk: MZP leads (5 vs 7).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, GUM or MZP?
Year to date GUM returned −2.88% and MZP returned 22.69%; over the last year GUM returned 57.50% and MZP returned 32.84%. Over the last month GUM returned −5.63% and MZP returned −1.52%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GUM or MZP?
As of September 28, 2026, GUM has a size of TRY 6.3B with 50,674 investors, while MZP has a size of TRY 5.7B with 123,085 investors. GUM leads in size and MZP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GUM and MZP mean?
The CMB risk score of GUM is 7 out of 7 and that of MZP is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.