Yatırımcı.AI

GGJ vs GUM Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GGJ (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Gümüş Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GUM (Ak Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

GGJGUM
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GGJ vs GUM Fund Comparison
MetricGGJGUMCategory median
Daily−0.57%−0.33%−0.33%
1 week−0.49%0.43%−0.80%
1 month−13.39%−11.92%−2.70%
3 months1.97%2.07%1.63%
6 months−21.08%−20.13%4.14%
YTD−13.91%−14.13%20.92%
1 year26.15%31.66%30.34%
3 years—282.43%165.29%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GGJ vs GUM Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GGJ (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Gümüş Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GUM (Ak Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GGJ leads in 3 and GUM leads in 6. GGJ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; GUM is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GUM leads (−0.33% vs −0.57%). 1 week: GUM leads (0.43% vs −0.49%). 1 month: GUM leads (−11.92% vs −13.39%). 3 months: GUM leads (2.07% vs 1.97%). 6 months: GUM leads (−20.13% vs −21.08%). YTD: GGJ leads (−13.91% vs −14.13%). 1 year: GUM leads (31.66% vs 26.15%). Size (TRY): GGJ leads (5.8B vs 5.6B). Investors: GGJ leads (53,460 vs 49,083).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GGJ returned −13.91% and GUM returned −14.13%; over the last year GGJ returned 26.15% and GUM returned 31.66%. Over the last month GGJ returned −13.39% and GUM returned −11.92%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, GGJ has a size of TRY 5.8B with 53,460 investors, while GUM has a size of TRY 5.6B with 49,083 investors. GGJ leads in size and GGJ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GGJ is 7 out of 7 and that of GUM is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.