GPC vs UNT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GPC (Garanti Portföy İkinci Serbest ( Döviz ) Fon) and UNT (İş Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GPC | UNT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.20% | 0.10% | 0.05% |
| 1 week | 0.61% | 0.68% | 0.44% |
| 1 month | 0.90% | 2.97% | 0.38% |
| 3 months | 4.04% | 9.70% | 3.95% |
| 6 months | 9.60% | 20.80% | 8.45% |
| YTD | 15.18% | 35.41% | 16.06% |
| 1 year | 20.95% | 45.71% | 20.98% |
| 3 years | 132.83% | — | 107.86% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GPC vs UNT Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GPC (Garanti Portföy İkinci Serbest ( Döviz ) Fon) and UNT (İş Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GPC leads in 2 and UNT leads in 7. GPC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; UNT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GPC leads (0.20% vs 0.10%). 1 week: UNT leads (0.68% vs 0.61%). 1 month: UNT leads (2.97% vs 0.90%). 3 months: UNT leads (9.70% vs 4.04%). 6 months: UNT leads (20.80% vs 9.60%). YTD: UNT leads (35.41% vs 15.18%). 1 year: UNT leads (45.71% vs 20.95%). Size (TRY): UNT leads (6.7B vs 6B). Investors: GPC leads (3,150 vs 292).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GPC or UNT?
Year to date GPC returned 15.18% and UNT returned 35.41%; over the last year GPC returned 20.95% and UNT returned 45.71%. Over the last month GPC returned 0.90% and UNT returned 2.97%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GPC or UNT?
As of October 22, 2026, GPC has a size of TRY 6B with 3,150 investors, while UNT has a size of TRY 6.7B with 292 investors. UNT leads in size and GPC leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GPC and UNT mean?
The CMB risk score of GPC is — out of 7 and that of UNT is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.