GBN vs UNT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GBN (Garanti Portföy Beşinci (TL) Serbest Fon) and UNT (İş Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GBN | UNT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.05% |
| 1 week | 0.67% | 0.68% | 0.44% |
| 1 month | 2.93% | 2.97% | 0.38% |
| 3 months | 9.56% | 9.70% | 3.95% |
| 6 months | 20.51% | 20.80% | 8.45% |
| YTD | 34.79% | 35.41% | 16.06% |
| 1 year | 44.70% | 45.71% | 20.98% |
| 3 years | 255.61% | — | 107.86% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GBN vs UNT Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GBN (Garanti Portföy Beşinci (TL) Serbest Fon) and UNT (İş Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GBN leads in 1 and UNT leads in 8. GBN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; UNT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: UNT leads (0.10% vs 0.10%). 1 week: UNT leads (0.68% vs 0.67%). 1 month: UNT leads (2.97% vs 2.93%). 3 months: UNT leads (9.70% vs 9.56%). 6 months: UNT leads (20.80% vs 20.51%). YTD: UNT leads (35.41% vs 34.79%). 1 year: UNT leads (45.71% vs 44.70%). Size (TRY): UNT leads (6.7B vs 6.6B). Investors: GBN leads (385 vs 292).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GBN or UNT?
Year to date GBN returned 34.79% and UNT returned 35.41%; over the last year GBN returned 44.70% and UNT returned 45.71%. Over the last month GBN returned 2.93% and UNT returned 2.97%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GBN or UNT?
As of October 22, 2026, GBN has a size of TRY 6.6B with 385 investors, while UNT has a size of TRY 6.7B with 292 investors. UNT leads in size and GBN leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GBN and UNT mean?
The CMB risk score of GBN is 2 out of 7 and that of UNT is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.