GPC vs NLK Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GPC (Garanti Portföy İkinci Serbest ( Döviz ) Fon) and NLK (Nurol Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GPC | NLK | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.20% | 0.10% | 0.05% |
| 1 week | 0.61% | 0.68% | 0.44% |
| 1 month | 0.90% | 3.04% | 0.38% |
| 3 months | 4.04% | 10.12% | 3.95% |
| 6 months | 9.60% | 21.82% | 8.45% |
| YTD | 15.18% | 37.57% | 16.06% |
| 1 year | 20.95% | 48.70% | 20.98% |
| 3 years | 132.83% | — | 107.86% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GPC vs NLK Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GPC (Garanti Portföy İkinci Serbest ( Döviz ) Fon) and NLK (Nurol Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GPC leads in 3 and NLK leads in 6. GPC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NLK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GPC leads (0.20% vs 0.10%). 1 week: NLK leads (0.68% vs 0.61%). 1 month: NLK leads (3.04% vs 0.90%). 3 months: NLK leads (10.12% vs 4.04%). 6 months: NLK leads (21.82% vs 9.60%). YTD: NLK leads (37.57% vs 15.18%). 1 year: NLK leads (48.70% vs 20.95%). Size (TRY): GPC leads (6B vs 5.9B). Investors: GPC leads (3,150 vs 804).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GPC or NLK?
Year to date GPC returned 15.18% and NLK returned 37.57%; over the last year GPC returned 20.95% and NLK returned 48.70%. Over the last month GPC returned 0.90% and NLK returned 3.04%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GPC or NLK?
As of October 22, 2026, GPC has a size of TRY 6B with 3,150 investors, while NLK has a size of TRY 5.9B with 804 investors. GPC leads in size and GPC leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GPC and NLK mean?
The CMB risk score of GPC is — out of 7 and that of NLK is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.