Yatırımcı.AI

GPC vs ZJI Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GPC (Garanti Portföy İkinci Serbest ( Döviz ) Fon) and ZJI (Ziraat Portföy İkinci Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

GPCZJI
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GPC vs ZJI Fund Comparison
MetricGPCZJICategory median
Daily0.20%−2.32%0.05%
1 week0.61%−7.99%0.44%
1 month0.90%−13.95%0.38%
3 months4.04%−16.20%3.95%
6 months9.60%−29.53%8.45%
YTD15.18%−32.12%16.06%
1 year20.95%−28.53%20.98%
3 years132.83%179.04%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GPC vs ZJI Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GPC (Garanti Portföy İkinci Serbest ( Döviz ) Fon) and ZJI (Ziraat Portföy İkinci Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GPC leads in 9 and ZJI leads in 1. GPC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZJI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GPC leads (0.20% vs −2.32%). 1 week: GPC leads (0.61% vs −7.99%). 1 month: GPC leads (0.90% vs −13.95%). 3 months: GPC leads (4.04% vs −16.20%). 6 months: GPC leads (9.60% vs −29.53%). YTD: GPC leads (15.18% vs −32.12%). 1 year: GPC leads (20.95% vs −28.53%). 3 years: ZJI leads (179.04% vs 132.83%). Size (TRY): GPC leads (6B vs 6B). Investors: GPC leads (3,150 vs 1,383).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GPC returned 15.18% and ZJI returned −32.12%; over the last year GPC returned 20.95% and ZJI returned −28.53%. Over the last month GPC returned 0.90% and ZJI returned −13.95%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, GPC has a size of TRY 6B with 3,150 investors, while ZJI has a size of TRY 6B with 1,383 investors. GPC leads in size and GPC leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GPC is — out of 7 and that of ZJI is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.