GGK vs HBF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GGK (Inveo Portföy Altın Fon) and HBF (Hsbc Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GGK | HBF | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.51% | 0.47% | 0.49% |
| 1 week | −1.62% | −1.68% | −1.65% |
| 1 month | −4.84% | −5.28% | −5.35% |
| 3 months | 10.11% | 10.04% | 10.41% |
| 6 months | 2.05% | 2.80% | 2.13% |
| YTD | 7.20% | 8.86% | 8.20% |
| 1 year | 26.82% | 30.31% | 27.66% |
| 3 years | 291.30% | 296.29% | 287.47% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GGK vs HBF comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GGK (Inveo Portföy Altın Fon) and HBF (Hsbc Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GGK leads in 5 and HBF leads in 6. GGK is a Gold Fund fund managed by Inveo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; HBF is a Gold Fund fund managed by Hsbc Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GGK leads (0.51% vs 0.47%). 1 week: GGK leads (−1.62% vs −1.68%). 1 month: GGK leads (−4.84% vs −5.28%). 3 months: GGK leads (10.11% vs 10.04%). 6 months: HBF leads (2.80% vs 2.05%). YTD: HBF leads (8.86% vs 7.20%). 1 year: HBF leads (30.31% vs 26.82%). 3 years: HBF leads (296.29% vs 291.30%). Size (TRY): HBF leads (6.1B vs 2B). Investors: GGK leads (10,401 vs 10,245). Risk: HBF leads (0 vs 6).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, GGK or HBF?
Year to date GGK returned 7.20% and HBF returned 8.86%; over the last year GGK returned 26.82% and HBF returned 30.31%. Over the last month GGK returned −4.84% and HBF returned −5.28%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GGK or HBF?
As of September 28, 2026, GGK has a size of TRY 2B with 10,401 investors, while HBF has a size of TRY 6.1B with 10,245 investors. HBF leads in size and GGK leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GGK and HBF mean?
The CMB risk score of GGK is 6 out of 7 and that of HBF is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.