FIB vs GGK Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FIB (Fiba Portföy Altın Fonu) and GGK (Inveo Portföy Altın Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | FIB | GGK | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.52% | 0.51% | 0.49% |
| 1 week | −1.67% | −1.62% | −1.65% |
| 1 month | −5.41% | −4.84% | −5.35% |
| 3 months | 10.19% | 10.11% | 10.41% |
| 6 months | 1.51% | 2.05% | 2.13% |
| YTD | 6.99% | 7.20% | 8.20% |
| 1 year | 26.36% | 26.82% | 27.66% |
| 3 years | 277.42% | 291.30% | 287.47% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the FIB vs GGK comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FIB (Fiba Portföy Altın Fonu) and GGK (Inveo Portföy Altın Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FIB leads in 4 and GGK leads in 6. FIB is a Gold Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GGK is a Gold Fund fund managed by Inveo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FIB leads (0.52% vs 0.51%). 1 week: GGK leads (−1.62% vs −1.67%). 1 month: GGK leads (−4.84% vs −5.41%). 3 months: FIB leads (10.19% vs 10.11%). 6 months: GGK leads (2.05% vs 1.51%). YTD: GGK leads (7.20% vs 6.99%). 1 year: GGK leads (26.82% vs 26.36%). 3 years: GGK leads (291.30% vs 277.42%). Size (TRY): FIB leads (4.8B vs 2B). Investors: FIB leads (11,920 vs 10,401).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, FIB or GGK?
Year to date FIB returned 6.99% and GGK returned 7.20%; over the last year FIB returned 26.36% and GGK returned 26.82%. Over the last month FIB returned −5.41% and GGK returned −4.84%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FIB or GGK?
As of September 28, 2026, FIB has a size of TRY 4.8B with 11,920 investors, while GGK has a size of TRY 2B with 10,401 investors. FIB leads in size and FIB leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FIB and GGK mean?
The CMB risk score of FIB is 6 out of 7 and that of GGK is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.