EAE vs HBF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EAE (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and HBF (Hsbc Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | EAE | HBF | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.54% | 0.47% | 0.49% |
| 1 week | −1.73% | −1.68% | −1.65% |
| 1 month | −5.18% | −5.28% | −5.35% |
| 3 months | 10.76% | 10.04% | 10.41% |
| 6 months | 2.68% | 2.80% | 2.13% |
| YTD | 11.52% | 8.86% | 8.20% |
| 1 year | 26.44% | 30.31% | 27.66% |
| 3 years | — | 296.29% | 287.47% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the EAE vs HBF comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EAE (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and HBF (Hsbc Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, EAE leads in 6 and HBF leads in 4. EAE is a Gold Fund fund managed by —; HBF is a Gold Fund fund managed by Hsbc Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: EAE leads (0.54% vs 0.47%). 1 week: HBF leads (−1.68% vs −1.73%). 1 month: EAE leads (−5.18% vs −5.28%). 3 months: EAE leads (10.76% vs 10.04%). 6 months: HBF leads (2.80% vs 2.68%). YTD: EAE leads (11.52% vs 8.86%). 1 year: HBF leads (30.31% vs 26.44%). Size (TRY): EAE leads (7.7B vs 6.1B). Investors: EAE leads (101,198 vs 10,245). Risk: HBF leads (0 vs 6).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, EAE or HBF?
Year to date EAE returned 11.52% and HBF returned 8.86%; over the last year EAE returned 26.44% and HBF returned 30.31%. Over the last month EAE returned −5.18% and HBF returned −5.28%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EAE or HBF?
As of September 28, 2026, EAE has a size of TRY 7.7B with 101,198 investors, while HBF has a size of TRY 6.1B with 10,245 investors. EAE leads in size and EAE leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EAE and HBF mean?
The CMB risk score of EAE is 6 out of 7 and that of HBF is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.