Yatırımcı.AI

CFA vs HBF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CFA (Qnb Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and HBF (Hsbc Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.

CFAHBF
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

CFA vs HBF Fund Comparison
MetricCFAHBFCategory median
Daily0.45%0.47%0.49%
1 week−1.53%−1.68%−1.65%
1 month−4.56%−5.28%−5.35%
3 months10.82%10.04%10.41%
6 months4.79%2.80%2.13%
YTD12.56%8.86%8.20%
1 year36.08%30.31%27.66%
3 years361.52%296.29%287.47%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the CFA vs HBF comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CFA (Qnb Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and HBF (Hsbc Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, CFA leads in 8 and HBF leads in 3. CFA is a Gold Fund fund managed by Qnb Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; HBF is a Gold Fund fund managed by Hsbc Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: HBF leads (0.47% vs 0.45%). 1 week: CFA leads (−1.53% vs −1.68%). 1 month: CFA leads (−4.56% vs −5.28%). 3 months: CFA leads (10.82% vs 10.04%). 6 months: CFA leads (4.79% vs 2.80%). YTD: CFA leads (12.56% vs 8.86%). 1 year: CFA leads (36.08% vs 30.31%). 3 years: CFA leads (361.52% vs 296.29%). Size (TRY): CFA leads (6.3B vs 6.1B). Investors: HBF leads (10,245 vs 4,584). Risk: HBF leads (0 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date CFA returned 12.56% and HBF returned 8.86%; over the last year CFA returned 36.08% and HBF returned 30.31%. Over the last month CFA returned −4.56% and HBF returned −5.28%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, CFA has a size of TRY 6.3B with 4,584 investors, while HBF has a size of TRY 6.1B with 10,245 investors. CFA leads in size and HBF leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CFA is 6 out of 7 and that of HBF is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.