GGK vs RPG Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GGK (Inveo Portföy Altın Fon) and RPG (Rota Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GGK | RPG | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.51% | 0.64% | 0.49% |
| 1 week | −1.62% | −1.65% | −1.65% |
| 1 month | −4.84% | −6.02% | −5.35% |
| 3 months | 10.11% | 10.78% | 10.41% |
| 6 months | 2.05% | 3.73% | 2.13% |
| YTD | 7.20% | 9.83% | 8.20% |
| 1 year | 26.82% | 31.54% | 27.66% |
| 3 years | 291.30% | 279.49% | 287.47% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GGK vs RPG comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GGK (Inveo Portföy Altın Fon) and RPG (Rota Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GGK leads in 5 and RPG leads in 5. GGK is a Gold Fund fund managed by Inveo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RPG is a Gold Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: RPG leads (0.64% vs 0.51%). 1 week: GGK leads (−1.62% vs −1.65%). 1 month: GGK leads (−4.84% vs −6.02%). 3 months: RPG leads (10.78% vs 10.11%). 6 months: RPG leads (3.73% vs 2.05%). YTD: RPG leads (9.83% vs 7.20%). 1 year: RPG leads (31.54% vs 26.82%). 3 years: GGK leads (291.30% vs 279.49%). Size (TRY): GGK leads (2B vs 902.5M). Investors: GGK leads (10,401 vs 1,357).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, GGK or RPG?
Year to date GGK returned 7.20% and RPG returned 9.83%; over the last year GGK returned 26.82% and RPG returned 31.54%. Over the last month GGK returned −4.84% and RPG returned −6.02%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GGK or RPG?
As of September 28, 2026, GGK has a size of TRY 2B with 10,401 investors, while RPG has a size of TRY 902.5M with 1,357 investors. GGK leads in size and GGK leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GGK and RPG mean?
The CMB risk score of GGK is 6 out of 7 and that of RPG is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.