Yatırımcı.AI

GGJ vs MZL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GGJ (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Gümüş Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MZL (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. İkinci Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

GGJMZL
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GGJ vs MZL Fund Comparison
MetricGGJMZLCategory median
Daily0.57%0.09%0.12%
1 week1.69%1.02%0.70%
1 month−11.39%−0.46%−1.87%
3 months−15.21%1.80%−0.82%
6 months−30.44%1.67%0.51%
YTD−19.69%21.79%20.46%
1 year15.88%28.89%27.26%
3 years—182.39%160.49%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GGJ vs MZL Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GGJ (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Gümüş Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MZL (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. İkinci Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GGJ leads in 2 and MZL leads in 8. GGJ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; MZL is a Fund of Funds fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GGJ leads (0.57% vs 0.09%). 1 week: GGJ leads (1.69% vs 1.02%). 1 month: MZL leads (−0.46% vs −11.39%). 3 months: MZL leads (1.80% vs −15.21%). 6 months: MZL leads (1.67% vs −30.44%). YTD: MZL leads (21.79% vs −19.69%). 1 year: MZL leads (28.89% vs 15.88%). Size (TRY): MZL leads (8.1B vs 5.3B). Investors: MZL leads (153,935 vs 51,932). Risk: MZL leads (4 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GGJ returned −19.69% and MZL returned 21.79%; over the last year GGJ returned 15.88% and MZL returned 28.89%. Over the last month GGJ returned −11.39% and MZL returned −0.46%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, GGJ has a size of TRY 5.3B with 51,932 investors, while MZL has a size of TRY 8.1B with 153,935 investors. MZL leads in size and MZL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GGJ is 7 out of 7 and that of MZL is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.