Yatırımcı.AI

MZL vs YZG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MZL (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. İkinci Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and YZG (Yapı Kredi Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

MZLYZG
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

MZL vs YZG Fund Comparison
MetricMZLYZGCategory median
Daily0.09%0.81%0.12%
1 week1.02%1.34%0.70%
1 month−0.46%−11.69%−1.87%
3 months1.80%−15.36%−0.88%
6 months1.67%−31.79%0.51%
YTD21.79%−21.49%20.46%
1 year28.89%17.40%27.26%
3 years182.39%276.14%160.49%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the MZL vs YZG Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of MZL (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. İkinci Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and YZG (Yapı Kredi Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, MZL leads in 7 and YZG leads in 4. MZL is a Fund of Funds fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; YZG is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: YZG leads (0.81% vs 0.09%). 1 week: YZG leads (1.34% vs 1.02%). 1 month: MZL leads (−0.46% vs −11.69%). 3 months: MZL leads (1.80% vs −15.36%). 6 months: MZL leads (1.67% vs −31.79%). YTD: MZL leads (21.79% vs −21.49%). 1 year: MZL leads (28.89% vs 17.40%). 3 years: YZG leads (276.14% vs 182.39%). Size (TRY): YZG leads (8.4B vs 8.1B). Investors: MZL leads (153,935 vs 54,283). Risk: MZL leads (4 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date MZL returned 21.79% and YZG returned −21.49%; over the last year MZL returned 28.89% and YZG returned 17.40%. Over the last month MZL returned −0.46% and YZG returned −11.69%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, MZL has a size of TRY 8.1B with 153,935 investors, while YZG has a size of TRY 8.4B with 54,283 investors. YZG leads in size and MZL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of MZL is 4 out of 7 and that of YZG is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.