GGJ vs MZP Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GGJ (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Gümüş Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MZP (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GGJ | MZP | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.57% | −0.45% | −0.33% |
| 1 week | −0.49% | −1.36% | −0.80% |
| 1 month | −13.39% | −3.91% | −2.70% |
| 3 months | 1.97% | 0.87% | 1.63% |
| 6 months | −21.08% | −0.23% | 4.14% |
| YTD | −13.91% | 18.81% | 20.92% |
| 1 year | 26.15% | 26.84% | 30.34% |
| 3 years | — | 172.73% | 165.29% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GGJ vs MZP Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GGJ (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Gümüş Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MZP (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GGJ leads in 3 and MZP leads in 7. GGJ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; MZP is a Fund of Funds fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MZP leads (−0.45% vs −0.57%). 1 week: GGJ leads (−0.49% vs −1.36%). 1 month: MZP leads (−3.91% vs −13.39%). 3 months: GGJ leads (1.97% vs 0.87%). 6 months: MZP leads (−0.23% vs −21.08%). YTD: MZP leads (18.81% vs −13.91%). 1 year: MZP leads (26.84% vs 26.15%). Size (TRY): GGJ leads (5.8B vs 5.4B). Investors: MZP leads (120,918 vs 53,460). Risk: MZP leads (5 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GGJ or MZP?
Year to date GGJ returned −13.91% and MZP returned 18.81%; over the last year GGJ returned 26.15% and MZP returned 26.84%. Over the last month GGJ returned −13.39% and MZP returned −3.91%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GGJ or MZP?
As of October 22, 2026, GGJ has a size of TRY 5.8B with 53,460 investors, while MZP has a size of TRY 5.4B with 120,918 investors. GGJ leads in size and MZP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GGJ and MZP mean?
The CMB risk score of GGJ is 7 out of 7 and that of MZP is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.