Yatırımcı.AI

FZP vs YKS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FZP (Fiba Portföy Serbest Fon) and YKS (Yapı Kredi Portföy İstanbul Serbest Fon) side by side.

FZPYKS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FZP vs YKS Fund Comparison
MetricFZPYKSCategory median
Today (est.)—−1.63%−2.71%
Daily−0.12%−0.02%0.05%
1 week−0.11%0.64%0.44%
1 month0.91%3.09%0.38%
3 months5.36%10.79%3.95%
6 months13.24%16.26%8.45%
YTD27.05%28.98%16.06%
1 year36.91%39.46%20.98%
3 years230.53%205.06%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Oct 22, 2026, 22:16.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FZP vs YKS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FZP (Fiba Portföy Serbest Fon) and YKS (Yapı Kredi Portföy İstanbul Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FZP leads in 2 and YKS leads in 9. FZP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YKS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: YKS leads (−0.02% vs −0.12%). 1 week: YKS leads (0.64% vs −0.11%). 1 month: YKS leads (3.09% vs 0.91%). 3 months: YKS leads (10.79% vs 5.36%). 6 months: YKS leads (16.26% vs 13.24%). YTD: YKS leads (28.98% vs 27.05%). 1 year: YKS leads (39.46% vs 36.91%). 3 years: FZP leads (230.53% vs 205.06%). Size (TRY): YKS leads (1B vs 745.6M). Investors: FZP leads (465 vs 430). Risk: YKS leads (2 vs 3).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FZP returned 27.05% and YKS returned 28.98%; over the last year FZP returned 36.91% and YKS returned 39.46%. Over the last month FZP returned 0.91% and YKS returned 3.09%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, FZP has a size of TRY 745.6M with 465 investors, while YKS has a size of TRY 1B with 430 investors. YKS leads in size and FZP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FZP is 3 out of 7 and that of YKS is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.