FZP vs PTF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FZP (Fiba Portföy Serbest Fon) and PTF (QNB Portföy Trend Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FZP | PTF | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.24% | 0.14% | 0.07% |
| 1 week | 0.85% | 1.08% | 0.51% |
| 1 month | 1.62% | 2.57% | 1.66% |
| 3 months | 5.50% | 7.85% | 3.04% |
| 6 months | 12.89% | 15.33% | 8.17% |
| YTD | 29.37% | 31.32% | 17.49% |
| 1 year | 36.35% | 38.18% | 21.23% |
| 3 years | 228.76% | — | 105.57% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FZP vs PTF Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FZP (Fiba Portföy Serbest Fon) and PTF (QNB Portföy Trend Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FZP leads in 3 and PTF leads in 7. FZP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PTF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FZP leads (0.24% vs 0.14%). 1 week: PTF leads (1.08% vs 0.85%). 1 month: PTF leads (2.57% vs 1.62%). 3 months: PTF leads (7.85% vs 5.50%). 6 months: PTF leads (15.33% vs 12.89%). YTD: PTF leads (31.32% vs 29.37%). 1 year: PTF leads (38.18% vs 36.35%). Size (TRY): FZP leads (685.6M vs 672.4M). Investors: FZP leads (439 vs 225). Risk: PTF leads (2 vs 3).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FZP or PTF?
Year to date FZP returned 29.37% and PTF returned 31.32%; over the last year FZP returned 36.35% and PTF returned 38.18%. Over the last month FZP returned 1.62% and PTF returned 2.57%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FZP or PTF?
As of November 13, 2026, FZP has a size of TRY 685.6M with 439 investors, while PTF has a size of TRY 672.4M with 225 investors. FZP leads in size and FZP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FZP and PTF mean?
The CMB risk score of FZP is 3 out of 7 and that of PTF is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.