FZP vs KRT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FZP (Fiba Portföy Serbest Fon) and KRT (Kare Portföy Türkiye Odaklı Serbest (Döviz ) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FZP | KRT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.12% | −0.01% | 0.05% |
| 1 week | −0.11% | 0.43% | 0.44% |
| 1 month | 0.91% | 1.20% | 0.38% |
| 3 months | 5.36% | 5.04% | 3.95% |
| 6 months | 13.24% | 11.32% | 8.45% |
| YTD | 27.05% | 17.83% | 16.06% |
| 1 year | 36.91% | 22.39% | 20.98% |
| 3 years | 230.53% | 113.12% | 107.86% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FZP vs KRT Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FZP (Fiba Portföy Serbest Fon) and KRT (Kare Portföy Türkiye Odaklı Serbest (Döviz ) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FZP leads in 6 and KRT leads in 4. FZP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KRT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: KRT leads (−0.01% vs −0.12%). 1 week: KRT leads (0.43% vs −0.11%). 1 month: KRT leads (1.20% vs 0.91%). 3 months: FZP leads (5.36% vs 5.04%). 6 months: FZP leads (13.24% vs 11.32%). YTD: FZP leads (27.05% vs 17.83%). 1 year: FZP leads (36.91% vs 22.39%). 3 years: FZP leads (230.53% vs 113.12%). Size (TRY): KRT leads (747.1M vs 745.6M). Investors: FZP leads (465 vs 126).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FZP or KRT?
Year to date FZP returned 27.05% and KRT returned 17.83%; over the last year FZP returned 36.91% and KRT returned 22.39%. Over the last month FZP returned 0.91% and KRT returned 1.20%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FZP or KRT?
As of October 22, 2026, FZP has a size of TRY 745.6M with 465 investors, while KRT has a size of TRY 747.1M with 126 investors. KRT leads in size and FZP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FZP and KRT mean?
The CMB risk score of FZP is 3 out of 7 and that of KRT is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.