BNC vs FZP Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BNC (Ak Portföy Beşinci Serbest Fon) and FZP (Fiba Portföy Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BNC | FZP | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.10% | 0.24% | 0.07% |
| 1 week | 0.60% | 0.85% | 0.51% |
| 1 month | 2.35% | 1.62% | 1.66% |
| 3 months | 9.69% | 5.50% | 3.04% |
| 6 months | 18.11% | 12.89% | 8.17% |
| YTD | 26.43% | 29.37% | 17.49% |
| 1 year | 35.53% | 36.35% | 21.23% |
| 3 years | 34.50% | 228.76% | 105.57% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BNC vs FZP Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BNC (Ak Portföy Beşinci Serbest Fon) and FZP (Fiba Portföy Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BNC leads in 3 and FZP leads in 8. BNC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FZP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FZP leads (0.24% vs 0.10%). 1 week: FZP leads (0.85% vs 0.60%). 1 month: BNC leads (2.35% vs 1.62%). 3 months: BNC leads (9.69% vs 5.50%). 6 months: BNC leads (18.11% vs 12.89%). YTD: FZP leads (29.37% vs 26.43%). 1 year: FZP leads (36.35% vs 35.53%). 3 years: FZP leads (228.76% vs 34.50%). Size (TRY): FZP leads (685.6M vs 670.2M). Investors: FZP leads (439 vs 215). Risk: FZP leads (3 vs 4).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BNC or FZP?
Year to date BNC returned 26.43% and FZP returned 29.37%; over the last year BNC returned 35.53% and FZP returned 36.35%. Over the last month BNC returned 2.35% and FZP returned 1.62%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BNC or FZP?
As of November 13, 2026, BNC has a size of TRY 670.2M with 215 investors, while FZP has a size of TRY 685.6M with 439 investors. FZP leads in size and FZP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BNC and FZP mean?
The CMB risk score of BNC is 4 out of 7 and that of FZP is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.