BNC vs PTF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BNC (Ak Portföy Beşinci Serbest Fon) and PTF (QNB Portföy Trend Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BNC | PTF | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.02% | 0.24% | 0.06% |
| 1 week | 0.82% | 0.79% | 0.56% |
| 1 month | 2.42% | 2.60% | 1.84% |
| 3 months | 9.77% | 7.77% | 3.29% |
| 6 months | 17.84% | 15.30% | 7.90% |
| YTD | 26.30% | 31.14% | 17.53% |
| 1 year | 35.35% | 38.12% | 21.48% |
| 3 years | 34.50% | — | 105.66% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BNC vs PTF Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BNC (Ak Portföy Beşinci Serbest Fon) and PTF (QNB Portföy Trend Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BNC leads in 3 and PTF leads in 7. BNC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PTF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PTF leads (0.24% vs 0.02%). 1 week: BNC leads (0.82% vs 0.79%). 1 month: PTF leads (2.60% vs 2.42%). 3 months: BNC leads (9.77% vs 7.77%). 6 months: BNC leads (17.84% vs 15.30%). YTD: PTF leads (31.14% vs 26.30%). 1 year: PTF leads (38.12% vs 35.35%). Size (TRY): PTF leads (671.4M vs 669.5M). Investors: PTF leads (225 vs 216). Risk: PTF leads (2 vs 4).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BNC or PTF?
Year to date BNC returned 26.30% and PTF returned 31.14%; over the last year BNC returned 35.35% and PTF returned 38.12%. Over the last month BNC returned 2.42% and PTF returned 2.60%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BNC or PTF?
As of November 12, 2026, BNC has a size of TRY 669.5M with 216 investors, while PTF has a size of TRY 671.4M with 225 investors. PTF leads in size and PTF leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BNC and PTF mean?
The CMB risk score of BNC is 4 out of 7 and that of PTF is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.