PSL vs PTF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PSL (Azimut Portföy 8.0 Serbest Fon) and PTF (QNB Portföy Trend Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | PSL | PTF | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.08% | 0.24% | 0.06% |
| 1 week | 0.46% | 0.79% | 0.56% |
| 1 month | 2.56% | 2.60% | 1.84% |
| 3 months | 6.94% | 7.77% | 3.29% |
| 6 months | 14.97% | 15.30% | 7.90% |
| YTD | 25.15% | 31.14% | 17.53% |
| 1 year | 29.42% | 38.12% | 21.48% |
| 3 years | 129.10% | — | 105.66% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the PSL vs PTF Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of PSL (Azimut Portföy 8.0 Serbest Fon) and PTF (QNB Portföy Trend Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, PSL leads in 0 and PTF leads in 10. PSL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PTF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PTF leads (0.24% vs 0.08%). 1 week: PTF leads (0.79% vs 0.46%). 1 month: PTF leads (2.60% vs 2.56%). 3 months: PTF leads (7.77% vs 6.94%). 6 months: PTF leads (15.30% vs 14.97%). YTD: PTF leads (31.14% vs 25.15%). 1 year: PTF leads (38.12% vs 29.42%). Size (TRY): PTF leads (671.4M vs 659M). Investors: PTF leads (225 vs 44). Risk: PTF leads (2 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, PSL or PTF?
Year to date PSL returned 25.15% and PTF returned 31.14%; over the last year PSL returned 29.42% and PTF returned 38.12%. Over the last month PSL returned 2.56% and PTF returned 2.60%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, PSL or PTF?
As of November 12, 2026, PSL has a size of TRY 659M with 44 investors, while PTF has a size of TRY 671.4M with 225 investors. PTF leads in size and PTF leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of PSL and PTF mean?
The CMB risk score of PSL is 5 out of 7 and that of PTF is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.