FSH vs PPV Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FSH (Fiba Portföy Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) and PPV (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FSH | PPV | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 1.27% | 0.09% | 0.06% |
| 1 week | −3.02% | 0.67% | 0.56% |
| 1 month | −9.04% | 3.01% | 1.84% |
| 3 months | −5.39% | 9.60% | 3.29% |
| 6 months | 0.55% | 21.13% | 7.90% |
| YTD | 27.11% | 24.83% | 17.53% |
| 1 year | 28.38% | — | 21.48% |
| 3 years | 218.80% | — | 105.66% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FSH vs PPV Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FSH (Fiba Portföy Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) and PPV (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, FSH leads in 3 and PPV leads in 6. FSH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FSH leads (1.27% vs 0.09%). 1 week: PPV leads (0.67% vs −3.02%). 1 month: PPV leads (3.01% vs −9.04%). 3 months: PPV leads (9.60% vs −5.39%). 6 months: PPV leads (21.13% vs 0.55%). YTD: FSH leads (27.11% vs 24.83%). Size (TRY): PPV leads (318.7M vs 309.9M). Investors: FSH leads (415 vs 139). Risk: PPV leads (2 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FSH or PPV?
Year to date FSH returned 27.11% and PPV returned 24.83%; over the last year FSH returned 28.38% and PPV returned —. Over the last month FSH returned −9.04% and PPV returned 3.01%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FSH or PPV?
As of November 12, 2026, FSH has a size of TRY 309.9M with 415 investors, while PPV has a size of TRY 318.7M with 139 investors. PPV leads in size and FSH leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FSH and PPV mean?
The CMB risk score of FSH is 6 out of 7 and that of PPV is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.