MDF vs PPV Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MDF (Fiba Portföy Model Emtia Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) and PPV (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | MDF | PPV | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −1.10% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
| 1 week | −1.64% | 0.67% | 0.68% |
| 1 month | −6.00% | 2.91% | 2.03% |
| 3 months | 3.25% | 9.61% | 3.24% |
| 6 months | 2.48% | 21.15% | 8.32% |
| YTD | 13.70% | 24.71% | 17.48% |
| 1 year | 21.93% | — | 21.33% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the MDF vs PPV Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of MDF (Fiba Portföy Model Emtia Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) and PPV (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 11, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, MDF leads in 1 and PPV leads in 8. MDF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PPV leads (0.09% vs −1.10%). 1 week: PPV leads (0.67% vs −1.64%). 1 month: PPV leads (2.91% vs −6.00%). 3 months: PPV leads (9.61% vs 3.25%). 6 months: PPV leads (21.15% vs 2.48%). YTD: PPV leads (24.71% vs 13.70%). Size (TRY): PPV leads (317.7M vs 316.7M). Investors: MDF leads (737 vs 141). Risk: PPV leads (2 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, MDF or PPV?
Year to date MDF returned 13.70% and PPV returned 24.71%; over the last year MDF returned 21.93% and PPV returned —. Over the last month MDF returned −6.00% and PPV returned 2.91%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, MDF or PPV?
As of November 11, 2026, MDF has a size of TRY 316.7M with 737 investors, while PPV has a size of TRY 317.7M with 141 investors. PPV leads in size and MDF leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of MDF and PPV mean?
The CMB risk score of MDF is 6 out of 7 and that of PPV is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.