IMF vs PPV Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IMF (İstanbul Portföy Maestro Serbest Fon) and PPV (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | IMF | PPV | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −1.43% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
| 1 week | 1.48% | 0.67% | 0.68% |
| 1 month | 1.74% | 2.91% | 2.03% |
| 3 months | 3.40% | 9.61% | 3.24% |
| 6 months | 8.60% | 21.15% | 8.32% |
| YTD | 10.93% | 24.71% | 17.48% |
| 1 year | 14.20% | — | 21.33% |
| 3 years | 91.38% | — | 105.67% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the IMF vs PPV Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of IMF (İstanbul Portföy Maestro Serbest Fon) and PPV (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 11, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, IMF leads in 1 and PPV leads in 8. IMF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PPV leads (0.09% vs −1.43%). 1 week: IMF leads (1.48% vs 0.67%). 1 month: PPV leads (2.91% vs 1.74%). 3 months: PPV leads (9.61% vs 3.40%). 6 months: PPV leads (21.15% vs 8.60%). YTD: PPV leads (24.71% vs 10.93%). Size (TRY): PPV leads (317.7M vs 317.2M). Investors: PPV leads (141 vs 18). Risk: PPV leads (2 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, IMF or PPV?
Year to date IMF returned 10.93% and PPV returned 24.71%; over the last year IMF returned 14.20% and PPV returned —. Over the last month IMF returned 1.74% and PPV returned 2.91%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, IMF or PPV?
As of November 11, 2026, IMF has a size of TRY 317.2M with 18 investors, while PPV has a size of TRY 317.7M with 141 investors. PPV leads in size and PPV leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of IMF and PPV mean?
The CMB risk score of IMF is 5 out of 7 and that of PPV is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.